CERN LHC = danger?

Link: http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100228/world-news/cern-atom-smasher-restarts

This is a quote from an article published at Times Of Malta February 28 2010:

'Scientists have restarted the world's most powerful atom-smasher overnight, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) said, as they launch a new bid to uncover the secrets of the universe.

"The LHC is on its way again. First beam of 2010 circulated in each direction by 04.10 CET," said CERN in a tweet on its website.'

Link: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/25/lhc_nqps_hiccup_delay/

This is a quote from an article published at The Register February 25 2010:

'First 2010 beams delayed as new redline painted on dial. A technical hiccup has delayed the planned restart of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the titanic subterranean magno-doughnut particle smasher situated deep beneath the Franco-Swiss border.

The LHC, most outrageous matter-rending machine ever assembled by the human race, had been expected to fire up its circulating hadron beams once more following the Xmas break today. However last night an "over enthusiastic" automatic protection system cut in, causing some fifty of the mighty collider's huge superconducting magnets to "quench". '

Link: http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=6

This is a quote from an article published at CERN Truth February 25 2010:

'CERN says it can’t create strange liquid because the collisions are very hot. But this information is misleading people. Only the external cover of a big-bang is very hot, as it does precisely to cool down the center where the strangelet forms. Consequently CERN will be creating more strange quarks. The proof of this phenomena came in the very first collisions in December, which created more strange quarks (kaons) than had been predicted, and with only 13% more energy. The increased rate was geometrical, hence at full energy it will create enough strange quarks to form strangelets.

In 2013 the LHC will accelerate protons and hadrons at maximal energy, colliding at over 1 Pev. Those collisions have the potential to create micro-black holes and top quark condensates (the real Higgs). The top quark condensates have properties similar to black holes, which according to Albert Einstein will not evaporate, rather convert matter (the Earth) into a 3 cm Black Hole or Frozen star.'

And:
'The majority of CERN physicists have sided with Stephen Hawking, who has stated ‘Einstein is double wrong’. Hawking claims black holes evaporate back in time, thereby dismissing Einstein and any potential danger. Einstein however has always been proved right and Hawking’s theories have not been proven in 40 years. By accepting that black holes travel to the past and evaporate, Hawking breaks the main laws of physics and science'

Link: http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=7

This is a quote from an article published at CERN Truth February 25 2010:

'CERN appears to invent its probabilities. One BBC quoted ‘expert’ stated the probability of blowing up the Earth was like winning the lottery 3 times in a row. Yet according to sciences Totalitarian Principle, particles that are not forbidden by the laws of physics always happen. When you switch a bulb, electrons always flow. If particles appeared only ’sometimes’, the Universe would be unstable and we would not exist.

According to the totalitarian principle the probabilities are closer to 100%. Cern has pushed aside risks and cherry picked theories that favor their confidentiality statements of zero risk. According to CERN these risks do not exist even if the theories it chooses to follow are false or obsolete.'

Link: http://www.scientificblogging.com/florilegium/blog/could_lawsuit_shut_down_lhc_cern

This is a quote from an article published on ScientificBlogging February 23 2010:

'An article has just been published at New Scientist claiming that if repeated attempts at lawsuits against the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) were to continue, then a judge may well have to decide on whether to pull the plug on the famous experiment.

Various lawsuits have already been filed and all have so far failed. We've been here before, but the NS shows that CERN keep changing their minds over the possibility of a black hole forming as new studies are released. As CERN updates its recommendations, so we could see a new batch of lawsuits with fresh concerns that the LHC may create a black hole that would destroy the world.'