CERN LHC = danger?

Link: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/JH30Dj02.html

This is a quote from asia news published on August 30 by Martin J. Young:

'The European Organization for Nuclear Research, more commonly known as CERN, had the attention of the global scientific community this week as it turned the switch on its latest experiment - breathtaking in its scope and, say some, the scale of risk. Months of buildup and years of research passed a key milestone when the Swiss-based laboratory finally started tests on its controversial Large Hadron Collider, a 27-kilometer circumference proton accelerator, the Big Daddy of all such machinery. '

And concludes with:

'Whatever the outcome, this is something to watch. The results could revolutionize physics as we know it ... or it could be the end of the world as we know it! '

Read the full article at:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/JH30Dj02.html

This is a quote from a thread started by Hasanuddin at LHCConcerns.com.

Hasanuddin writes:
'Let me introduce myself, I am Hasanuddin. I am advancing a brand new model, the Dominium. Most of the model is completely new, even to me, because the full seamless work only became fully manifest as it was transcribed this past summer. Over the past five months, the model has been download by thousands of people and has withstood intense scrutiny on my SciAm blog. http://science-community.sciam.com/foru ... =300005039 Although there have been multiple determined detractors, to date, none have been able to successfully find fault with the new model. To the contrary, three of the past wanna-be detractors ended up supplying three separate and new tangential lines of evidence in support of the new model.'

And later:
'Too often, people underestimate their own ability to affect the “Big Picture.” Even an autonomous citadel, such as CERN, can be swayed if enough public pressure is applied. Therefore I urge the readers of this model to do something. At the very least, talk and communicate with all those around you. Don’t underestimate (or overestimate) the importance of others. Don’t rely on anyone else to take action—we are talking about your life, the lives of the children you know, and the lives of all animals, plants, and bacteria. In this dilemma, we are all in this together, but we must act as separate individuals. We are currently in a race against time. Can enough people start making their voices heard to force the reevaluation of the LHC project; or will momentum and pigheadedness lead to the start-up of LHC as planned? All actions count. Remember: inaction and apathy are themselves actions that favor the status quo. If you’ve read this article, then you are now an accessory. How you play your next moves is up to you. Please read the model. Feel free to pass the model on to whomever. The only advice I can give is: listen to your heart and act now—start-up could be as soon as mid-June.'

Read the full thread at:
http://www.lhcconcerns.com/LHCConcerns/Forums/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=128

This article was published on ITWIRE at 04. Feb 2008

I quote:
'Some of the world’s top scientists, including some Nobel Prize winners, are preparing to create black-hole material in a laboratory in Europe this spring. What will happen when they fire up the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)—the largest machine on earth? Will the black-hole material be stable? Will it be controllable? European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN) scientists say their experiment is safe, but how they are sure? Some opposing nuclear physicists have raised the alarm, including a Nobel laureate.
Scientists at LHC, outside of Geneva, have been planning for years to collide bundles of 10,000,000,000,000 (10 trillion) protons moving at the speed of light head-on into other bundles of 10 trillion protons. The LHC is a new type of accelerator, which will cause collisions to pile up at predetermined junctions into a huge dogpile of collisions that have the potential to build spontaneous black-holes.'

And:
'As the author of The Dominium, a new book outlining a new scientific model on antimatter and gravity relationships, I am raising questions about the presumption that mini-black-holes are harmless. The Dominium model outlines cosmological events from Big Bang to Big Bang. This model is not plagued by anomaly as other theories are. It is coherent. It is seamless. Yet this model presents the awful implication: mini black-holes will not disappear as simply as predicted. They will persist, and they will begin compacting, which in scientific terms means they will be “stable” and uncontrollable.'

And later:
'One theory asserts that cosmic rays often produce mini black-holes naturally in the environment, however these claims are not backed up with any recorded evidence. The only supports for this theory are computer simulations, which the proponents designed themselves. But can computer modeling truly be considered evidence in the absence of recorded confirmation? A computer can be programmed to show just about anything—even fantasy and fiction. If lone nuclei cosmic rays do not produce black-holes, then there is no reason to suggest that synthetic black-holes could spontaneously evaporate safely out of existence, as LHC proponents would have us hope.'

Read the full article at:
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/16440/545/

Hasanuddin has written a book which is available at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Dominium-Sequencing-antimatter-gravity-effects/dp/0980096332/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211023567&sr=1-2

The Dominium
Dominium Sequencing antimatter and gravity effect: Big Bang to black hole; and implications for a manmade near-future doomsday: End-of-all-life on Earth

A short version is available for download at:
http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/u56srb

In this paper he says:
'It wasn’t until the transcription of the “Dark Event” did the source of the sense doom hit me: the Dark Event is a period predicted by the Dominium, when all across the Universe small black holes were created. Suddenly, memories of CERN flashed before my eyes: “Small black holes can’t exist,” I was taught in a CERN lecture. “Only the most massive stars ever become black holes. Therefore, CERN’s future plans to generate black hole material inside of LHC are perfectly safe…they will last less than a microsecond before reverting back to common forms of matter.” Or so all of those in attendance in the lecturehall were told.'

And later:
'If such a stable species were made on Earth, if it bumped into anything, its event horizon would be breached. It would consume. It would continue to bump into things and it would continue to grow as it went. Gaining mass it would sink into the Earth, consuming any matter it touches. Reaching the core of the Earth, the likelike attractive force causes matter to be drawn into the blackhole, which would consume at an enormous rate. Days? Minutes? Seconds? There’s no certain way to answer the question, “How much time will it take until the entire planet is consumed into a speck the size of a pea?” One thing is certain, once the process starts, nothing will stop it.'

And then:
'The companion book, The Dominium Epiphanies,will only be of use in a postdoomsdayaverted
world and its publication will not be considered unless LHC is stopped. Something dreadfully horrible must be prevented before anything else can progress.'

The discussion about his theory in his blog looks serious:
http://science-community.sciam.com/blog/Hasanuddins-Blog/300005039